thanks for sharing the experience Bertrand. There are two documents in Forrest I can use for this html2doc10.xsl and doc102fo.xsl (not sure about the correct names). I'll check them out and perhaps move them to doc11, this would make some Forresters very happy (reading this Konstantin?). Bert
At 12:54 15/07/2002 +0200, you wrote: >Unfortunately I don't have a working XHTML to FO conversion, rather some >experience to share: we wrote such a transformation for a customer project >(too specific to share I'm afraid), and in retrospect I think the following >structure would have been much more reusable and maintainable: > > XHTML -> logical document -> FO > >using two XSLT transforms. > >By "logical document" I mean going back to your document structure, >extracting the "meat" from the input document. Then only in the second >transform would you apply presentation to it. > >This is much easier to test and debug than a single-pass transform IMHO, and >converting to logical structure is much more reusable if you need to generate >other formats or different presentations later on. > >My 2 cents.. >-Bertrand > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >Please check that your question has not already been answered in the >FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/index.html> > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please check that your question has not already been answered in the FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/index.html> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>