subj
was "sexy open source". I don't think that there's "sexy open source" RDBMS
comparing to Oracle, or even MS SQL Server.
Ok,
Apache is sexy, comparing to IIS indeed.
business doesn't care about opennes as much as about performance and
features.
Cocoon
is sexy too, btw
jBoss
is not.
-----Original Message-----
From: Manos Batsis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 9:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: sexy open sourceArgyn,Err... the subject says "open source".I don't think there is a point in arguing about what sucks and what doesn't, so I just won't.Manos-----Original Message-----
From: Argyn Kuketayev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 4:05 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: sexy open sourceRDBMS must be Oracle. no other options, imho.
cost is not a problem. it's negligeable comparing to the cost of one DBA. while at the same time performance and other features of Oracle are far better than anything.
> 4) Business Logic Persistence
> Proposal: Firebird RDBMS as JBoss servicejBoss sucks, imho.