Hugo Burm wrote:

>Hello,
>
>I am working on an application that embeds XML definitions for a JFreeChart
>chart in my XML content. (for JFreeChart see www.object-refinery.com)
>
>The XML looks like:
>
><jfc width="500" height="400" xmlns="http://datagram.nl/survey";>
>... some xml tags that define my chart....
></jfc>
>
>I decided to use the "svg" approach: filtering the svg/jfc tags into a
>separate pipeline.
>
>I am using the Cocoon "extractor" transformer to filter my "jfc" fragment.
>In my sitemap I modified some parameters of the extractor. E.g.:
><extract-element>jfc</extract-element>
>
>In my "fragment-extractor.xsl" stylesheet I am catching these
>"fe.fragment"'s and replacing them with an uri that is matched by the
>sitemap. The svg example uses as uri: "some_virtual_map/{$id}.png". And this
>png is matched by the sitemap and serialized by svg2png. I created a jfc2png
>reader that matches my "some_virtual_map/{$id}.png", builds the jfreechart,
>and serializes to png.
>
>The problem: everything works OK until I want to mix svg and jfc on the same
>page. The extraction process works fine, but I did not find a way to
>differentiate between svg and jfc in my "fragment-extractor.xsl" stylesheet.
>So I don't know when to use svg2png and when to use my jfc2png.
>

Hugo,

You always can do:

- extract SVG
- run your fragment-extractor-svg.xsl
- extract JFC
- run your fragment-extractor-jfc.xsl



>The problem is created by the "FragmentExtractorTransformer.java" class.
>It knows the name of the element it is filtering, but it does not pass it
>any further.
>So the easiest solution seems to be to add a new attribute that passes the
>name of the filtered element. Somewhere around line 350 of the
>"FragmentExtractorTransformer.java" class.
>

Or, you can patch transformer.

Vadim



>Did I miss something? Is there a way to find out in the
>"fragment-extractor.xsl" stylesheet about the element that was extracted? Is
>there some other solution? Or do I indeed have to modify the java class as
>desscribed above? Or use a quick hack: compile my own version of the
>extractor class and use   fj.fragment instead of fe.fragment?
>
>Thanks
>
>Hugo Burm
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please check that your question  has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting.     <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/index.html>

To unsubscribe, e-mail:     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to