>From what I understand, yes. In 2.1 SourceWritingTransformer has been merged with ex-sunrise InsertTransformer.
Alex --- ROSSEL Olivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I use old-style SWT: > > <source:write src="..."> > <tree-to-be-written> > ... > </tree-to-be-written> > </source> > > It seems that there is a newer syntax (with a very > interesting source:insert > !! ) > but I can't get it to work in C2.0.3. It seems that > the SWT I have still > uses > the old-style syntax. > > Is the new SWT only available in C2.1dev ? > > > This e-mail is intended only for the above > addressee. It may contain > privileged information. If you are not the addressee > you must not copy, > distribute, disclose or use any of the information > in it. If you have > received it in error please delete it and > immediately notify the sender. > Security Notice: all e-mail, sent to or from this > address, may be > accessed by someone other than the recipient, for > system management and > security reasons. This access is controlled under > Regulation of > Investigatory Powers Act 2000, Lawful Business > Practises. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Please check that your question has not already > been answered in the > FAQ before posting. > <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/index.html> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please check that your question has not already been answered in the FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/index.html> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
