I'm using Saxon as well, it seems faster than Xalan. And with Xalan I always
had problems with the normalize-space function.
The only problem I have with Saxon is the compiling of the sitemap.
I'm using Cocoon 2.0.2.

Did you have the same problem comipiling the sitemap with Cocoon ?
Cheers
Beat De Martin

> On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 20:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Dear listmembers,
> > 
> > after a frustrating night trying to use xsltc as a faster way to process
> > xsls, browsing hundreds of archieve threads, the xsltc wiki I was not
> > successfull.
> 
> I was able to make it work for a subset of my xslts (those that didn't
> use parameters).
> 
> > Has anybody succesfully integrated xsltc (or any other  fast xsl
> compiler
> > into cocoon? Does anybody know about the status of integrating xsltc
> into
> > cocoon? Or maybe you can just give an alternative for speeding up
> transfomation.
> > (BUT i don't want to write custom transformers by hand)
> 
> We switched our default xslt processor to saxon (the last of the 6
> releases) and have been very happy with it.
> 
> > Your help is very welcome!
> > 
> > Robert
> 
> -k.
> 
> -- 
> If you don't test then your code is only a collection of bugs which 
> apparently behave like a working program. 
> 
> Website: http://www.rocketred.com.au/blogs/kevin/
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Please check that your question  has not already been answered in the
> FAQ before posting.     <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/index.html>
> 
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 

-- 
+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more  http://www.gmx.net +++
NEU: Mit GMX ins Internet. Rund um die Uhr für 1 ct/ Min. surfen!


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please check that your question  has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting.     <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/index.html>

To unsubscribe, e-mail:     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to