True true, and thank you Peter. I should have clarified, not lack of object hierarchy and polymorphism, but lack of perfect or ...traditional. Some deny a comparison between xslt and oop languages. My discussion with the colleague was brief; I cannot interpret his experience perfectly. The serious problem apparently was synching xml, xslt with changes in the underlying object model. I drew a parallel with OODBMS, a solution which still defies popularity. Meanwhile, Jsp and struts continue to preside over cocoon, much to my disappointment. It's a hard sell, while they are an easy sell. No one gets fired over choosing Oracle, Weblogic, jsp followed by MacDonald's for lunch.
Adrian Boston -----Original Message----- From: Hunsberger, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 8:33 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Simple example / XML / XSLT In production > I was debating xml, xslt versus jsp with a colleague. He noted that although xml, xslt works well in a > divided graphics/analyst/developer big team, it eventually was scrapped for JSP. The lack of object > hierarchy and polymorphism made changes very difficult. Can anyone provide tales of xml, xslt in a > major production? (sans company name, of course) We're certainly heading towards having a lot of xml and xslt in production. Can't imagine doing what we are doing with JSP: we need 100's of customized variations of any given "screen". My reason for replying however is the comment on lack of object hierarchy and polymorphism. I'm confused by this: although it's certainly true that XSLT is not an OO language that doesn't mean it cannot map constructs to OO languages. In particular, XML can map OO isomorphically and XSLT can then traverse this mapping. Moreover, XSLT does allow for some many different types of hierarchy (include, import, modes and priorities) that, although different than OO aggregation and inheritance can be used in similar ways. Finally, much XSLT is run without schema/DTD validation which allows it in a way to support the ultimate in polymorphism: your data can dynamically change "type". This last is a bit of a straw man, but let me put it this way; XSLT is Turing complete, anything you can program in any other language can be done with XSLT. It's not always easy, but then again, sometimes it's a lot easier than using JSP... --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please check that your question has not already been answered in the FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/index.html> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please check that your question has not already been answered in the FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/index.html> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
