Jeff Turner wrote, On 11/02/2003 5.14:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 02:09:17PM -0500, Ben Young wrote:
...
Good idea. Back to book.xml? ;-)I've looked into the Forrest site.xml work and I like it for the most part, but the thought of managing a single navigational map for an entire 7,000+ page site seems a bit unruly.Ouch.. yes it would. With a sitemap tweak, site.xml could xinclude site.xml's from subdirectories though.
Ok, I'm just joking. I want to use xinclude in it too, but for another reason: download part of the site structure from a common place, for multiple site consistency. This would help in the above task, and as Jeff says could (and probably should), be automated.
The question is: how many entries does site.xml have? One for each page? Is it because of semantic linking or because you want them in th navigation?
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/index.html>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
