Hi Carsten, > production since years now - I don't have any links handy > right now :( So, you can call the framework usable and stable.
Maybe someone else can jump in. would be useful in the 'sales pitch'! > The development of the cocoon portal will continue and it > will be even more powerfull and extensible than it is now. Excellent. > Just a teaser: What do you think of a portal that can run > "cocoon portlets" and jetspeed based portlets at the same time? Since we're developing all from scratch, I'd rather settle on a single approach from the beginning but, since the jetspeed approach has been out for a while longer, it sounds a good idea. Cheers, Tony. > -----Original Message----- > From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 24 February 2003 15:47 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Portal: usable now? Usable in future? > > > The portal and authentication framework are used in > production since years now - I don't have any links handy > right now :( So, you can call the framework usable and stable. > > I can't compare the cocoon portal with jetspeed, because that > wouldn't be objective enough, I fear. But if you want to use > Cocoon anyway, use the Cocoon portal; if you want to build > your application based on XML and XSLT (for example for > multi-channel), use the cocoon portal. If jetspeed provides > everything you need know and in the foreseen future, > well...aeh...use the jetspeed portal of course. > > In general, I guess the cocoon portal is more flexible > because of it's XML/XSLT nature - so you can add new > features, integrate new portlets without writing one line > java code; it's just a matter of "configuration". > > The development of the cocoon portal will continue and it > will be even more powerfull and extensible than it is now. > > Just a teaser: What do you think of a portal that can run > "cocoon portlets" and jetspeed based portlets at the same time? > > Carsten > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tony Linde [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 4:35 PM > > To: Cocoon-Users-List > > Subject: Portal: usable now? Usable in future? > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I am PM of a project that needs to deploy a workable but > customisable > > portal as one of its components. The team working on this > has set up a > > Jetspeed-based solution using the demo site. I was wondering how > > usable the Cocoon portal webapp is and whether anyone has > compared it > > to the Jetspeed one. > > > > Also, is work still continuing on the Auth and Portal > webapps? And is > > there a release date for them? > > > > We have to release incremental builds of the project but the final > > release isn't until end of 2004 so I'm happy for us to work > with beta > > code (and even contribute to it if it adds to our project > > functionality) as long as it seems a viable long-term project. What > > are the long-term prospects of the Portal? > > > > Thanks, > > Tony. > > > > __ > > Tony Linde Phone: +44 (0)116 223 1292 > > AstroGrid Project Manager Fax: +44 (0)116 252 3311 > > Dept of Physics & Astronomy Mobile: +44 (0)7753 603356 > > University of Leicester Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Leicester, UK LE1 7RH Web: http://www.astrogrid.org > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
