On 12.Mar.2003 -- 05:55 PM, Scherler, Thorsten wrote:
>
> that is actually working fine!
>
> Maybe a reason:
> The one we started the discussion with:
> The first query was based on a ACCESS query and the second was based on a table!
>
> The personnel is based on 2 tables! <- I have put everything in an Access DB to see
> whether it is working!
>
> ...what do you thing?
>From the implementation point of view it should not make a
difference. ESQL does not know about tables. All it knows about are
queries and result sets.
So, if it really depends on MS Access whether there are two or one
table, I'd say either the jdbc driver or MS Access is
broken. Following the discussions on this list, I'd say both
are. Anyhow, I have not worked with these products, this is only
hearsay.
But there might have slipped a typo into your sample and table count
doesn't matter.
Chris.
--
C h r i s t i a n H a u l
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
fingerprint: 99B0 1D9D 7919 644A 4837 7D73 FEF9 6856 335A 9E08
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
