That was one of my first thoughts. On the other hand, it wouldn't be that hard to require logging in before editing as some people already do anyway. It's not like it is even a big hassle, passwords aren't even required. It could be presented more like "Why don't you briefly introduce yourself (perhaps just a name) before editing on our site?". Friendly enough for genuine contributors but hopefully just enough of a hassle for those who are passing through wiki sites leaving damage. Of course it really can't be prevented, but if a cookie is set and an IP grabbed, then perhaps that person can be blocked in the future.
/S Boon Hian Tek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Steven Cummings wrote: >> Does wiki not store revisions that can be rolled back? >> >> /S >Still someone has to spot it before that is done. Meanwhile, >people can be confused and misled. But still, I love the >free spirit of the Wiki too much to see this as sufficient >reason to lock it down. What do you think? > >-- >Fortune finishes the great quotations, #12 > > Those who can, do. Those who can't, write the instructions. > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Steven Cummings Columbia, MO Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM: cummingscs ICQ: 3330114 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __________________________________________________________________ McAfee VirusScan Online from the Netscape Network. Comprehensive protection for your entire computer. Get your free trial today! http://channels.netscape.com/ns/computing/mcafee/index.jsp?promo=393397 Get AOL Instant Messenger 5.1 free of charge. Download Now! http://aim.aol.com/aimnew/Aim/register.adp?promo=380455 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
