Bla bla bla bla submit a patch bla bla bla bla -andy
On 6/3/03 8:02 AM, "Alexander Schatten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Conal Tuohy wrote: > >> Andrew C. Oliver wrote: >> >> >> >>> Why not just add a parameter which removes them or not, big >>> deal. No reason >>> for Yet Another Class. >>> >>> >> >> Why provide an _option_ for people to output invalid HTML? >> >> Seriously, isn't it _always_ a bug to output namespaces in the HTML? What >> are the use cases for HTML + namespaces?? Is anyone actually using this >> "feature" to output HTML with namespace attributes for some obscure purpose? >> >> > this is what I try to argue for days. some think obviously that it > should be possible to produce invalid HTML, I do not know why. however, > I would be really glad if it would be possible to generate valid HTML > automatically without needing to write additional stylesheets... > > > alex > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Andrew C. Oliver http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI http://jakarta.apache.org/poi For Java and Excel, Got POI? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
