> nevertheless it is imho the completly wrong attempt. because FOP is not
> ready for primetime, you suggest to put energy to integrate a legacy
> system, that does not fit into the XML publishing process?? this sounds
> weird to me. far better would be the idea to invest more energy in
> enhancing FOP.

[...]

> I really cannot see the point. the only thing I would need is a
> generator that 1:1 tries to move LaTeX into XML, if this is a user
> written command or not.

I do not intend to be rude - but it might make sense if you learn a bit more
about what TeX is doing before you make such judgements.

Anyway you are free to try to enhance FO so that it can replace TeX.

Andreas


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to