> nevertheless it is imho the completly wrong attempt. because FOP is not > ready for primetime, you suggest to put energy to integrate a legacy > system, that does not fit into the XML publishing process?? this sounds > weird to me. far better would be the idea to invest more energy in > enhancing FOP.
[...] > I really cannot see the point. the only thing I would need is a > generator that 1:1 tries to move LaTeX into XML, if this is a user > written command or not. I do not intend to be rude - but it might make sense if you learn a bit more about what TeX is doing before you make such judgements. Anyway you are free to try to enhance FO so that it can replace TeX. Andreas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]