Ivan Popov writes: > If your files are rather big, you might do it with Coda. > Coda does not handle well > - lots of small files (because of rvm size limitation) > - really big files (as whole file caching can feel slow) > - concurrent updates (creating conflicts) > but on the other side it is very good at hiding flaky lines and > failing servers, does not waste bandwidth and can be really fast, > depending on your usage pattern.
At this time, we have 64GB and 3.3M Inodes used on our ext3 filesystem. We are hosting websites: mostly PHP scripts, images, few videos. I think the biggests files are around 100MB. We don't need concurrent updates nor really big files. What would be the biggest partition I could share with Coda with this usage pattern? -- Cyril Bouthors
