Hello Jan, thanks for the reply.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 10:53:55PM -0400, Jan Harkes wrote: > There are actually some changes in git that are not as friendly for a > shared repository, however most of those are optional or don't apply to > 'bare' repositories. Specifically the newly introduced packed refs > format (which is optional) and the fact that pruning a repository tries > to remove the individual object directories. Which means that the idea of shared repositories has not crossed the minds of git developers :( > This way I can update the source on my laptop even when my local Coda > client is 'temporarily unavailable', but updates are still written back > through /coda. It might be hard to use Coda when a Coda client is "absent" :) Regards, Rune
