* Jan Harkes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,
> I think pkg-config is a good thing, however the example you give > is probably the one dependency that is essentially unnecessary. > The only reason for the openssl dependency is for md5 and sha1, > but we've had generic implementations of both of these algorithms > for a long time and those are already used when openssl is not > found by configure. So should we drop the openssl dependency completely ? BTW: are these implementations within code or separate libs ? > A more significant change that I have had on my todo list for > a long time is to move the Coda build to automake. What benefits does that bring ? > Part of that would also include avoiding the 'copy headers to > coda-obj/include directory' step. Isn't that an issue of proper -I flags ? cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------
