On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 01:16:25PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > We lack the hardware for doing regular development on x86_64 > nor are we inclined to duplicate the efforts for maintaining another > development environment. > Keeping userland 32-bit does indeed spare a lot of resources. >
Well, it is a highly unusual set up so you are probably on your own when it comes to problems due to the mismatch of userland and kernel bit-ness > Would somebody give me a hand and either point in the right direction > for the fix or explain that the solution is unavailable or too expensive? > Why not just use something like qemu to do the 32bit work? Performance should be quite acceptable on a 64bit machine. -- Brett Lymn
