On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 10:22:32AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: > > A "modified FUSE" is conceptually the same as a "Coda-specific kernel > > interface", unless you convince the world that the wannabe new feature > > is useful for "everyone" or at least for "many", besides Coda :( > > Yes, but for any filesystem that has container files for local copies, > the passthrough is useful. So it is far more broadly useful than coda. > It could be an optional extension, used if present, and put into a few > FUSE implementations.
It looks definitely useful, but is there any filesystem other than Coda, willing to benefit from such a capability? I do not mean to sound negative, I just do not know the answer. Rune
