[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
| Jan Harkes wrote:
| > How did the talk go? Did you manage to get everything running for the
| > demo?
| Nope, afraid not. It wasn't nearly as big a loss as VNC would have
| been; Coda isn't visually very spectacular even when it works, while
| VNC is. I just sat on the table and talked about Coda and what it
| could do.
Have you seen the logcmls/logreintegration/etc. tcl/tk/tix scripts?
They are an attempt at presenting some of the information from codacon
in a slightly more visually appealing way. They are still a far cry
from a GUI ofcourse.
| I will still be working on it, though.
Cool.
| > | I began describing the differences, and then I realized: Coda's
| > | functionality closely mirrors that of CVS.
| >
| > How's that? CVS gives every developer his own sandbox for development,
| > so that people working on the same files will not influence others.
| > However, in Coda, everyone is working on the exactly same files, with
| > the small exception that they do not influence each other while working
| > disconnected.
| In Coda, when you open a file for write [in write-connected mode], how
| soon can others see your changes? Immediately? After you close the
| file?
After you close the file. The file is stored on the server when the
last writer closes it.
Jan
