>We had a discussion about this here yesterday. Phil, why don't you go for
>the native Solaris C library and the native compiler. Take it step by
>step: lwp, rpc2, rvm etc. and lets review what it looks like after each
>step.
I don't think that using gcc and gnu make would be bad. It does look
like lib-src/mlwp/process.s requires gas. I'll continue to look into
what it will take.
--
Phil Nelson NetBSD: http://www.netbsd.org
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Coda: http://www.coda.cs.cmu.edu
http://www.cs.wwu.edu/~phil
