On Thu, 24 Jun 1999, Jan Harkes wrote:
> I would say that re-exporting Coda through NFS or Samba definitely does
> not solve you High Availability problem. First of all the node that
> re-exports the Coda-FS will be your single point of failure. And second,
> you increase the chances on getting conflicts that will affect everybody
> and not just the user causing the conflict. Normally, only the less
> frequently occuring server-server conflicts will be visible for all
> clients, and most of these are already automatically resolved by the
> Coda servers.
>
> Providing only read-only access through the samba/nfs exports can be
> done reliably, but that is probably not what you want.
>
I need read and write access.
So, Coda isn't a good solution to achieve a high availability ISP
(normally an ISP client hasn't Coda source).
Do you Know a solution to achieve a high availability ISP with Coda?
Should if forget coda in my project ?
Thanks
Iniaki
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.~. Iñaki Fernández Villanueva
DEBIAN/GNU /V\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
// \\ Linux registered user #93164
SLINK 2.1 /( )\ Student in Computer Engineering
^^-^^ University of San Sebastian (Spain)
www.debian.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
