success! It looks like restarting the codasrv on SCM did the trick.
thanks.
> On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 11:44:35PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > 22:56:24 VAttachVolumeById: vol 1000002 (s.src.0) attached and online
> > 22:56:24 create: volume 1000002 (s.src.0) created
>
> Looks good, the volume is correctly built, and attached on the first server.
>
> > 22:57:26 VAttachVolumeById: vol 2000001 (s.src.1) attached and online
> > 22:57:26 create: volume 2000001 (s.src.1) created
>
> Same here. Looks perfect.
>
> > If I do an ls -l in /coda this is what I get:
> >
> > (chiodi@iceman:/coda)--> ls -l
> > total 1
> > lrw-r--r-- 1 chiodi nogroup 7 Sep 13 22:59 src -> #s.src
> ...
> > the following is the rest of the SCM's SrvLog:
> > 22:58:23 vrent::GetVolumeInfo: no hostaddr for volume (33554433)
> > 22:58:23 vrent::GetVolumeInfo: no hostaddr for volume (33554433)
> > 22:58:32 vrent::GetVolumeInfo: no hostaddr for volume (33554433)
> > 22:58:32 vrent::GetVolumeInfo: no hostaddr for volume (33554433)
>
> The SCM?? that's the one on which the volume lookup databases are
> created in the first place. The lookup is for a volume with number
> 2000001 (hex(33554433)), which is the volume on the second server.
>
> And looking at the lookup function, it failed to find a host with hostid
> #2 in the list of host addresses.
>
> This list is constructed by reading /vice/db/servers. And it looks like
> this file is _only_ read right after a server is started. So you
> probably only have to restart the codasrv on the SCM, and everything
> will work.
>
> If restarting doesn't help, the volume replication database is bad.
>
> - What is the contents of /vice/vol/AllVolumes on the SCM
> - Similarily, what is in /vice/vol/VRList on the SCM
>
> Those files are used as a basis to contruct the volume databases.
>
> Also, the clients sometimes seem to cache volume data too long, in a way
> it is a bit like trying to unmount a filesystem while some process still
> has hold on an inode. Restarting your client with '-init' should clear
> out any bad memories :)
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 07:14:19AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Clement,
> >
> > Mine looked like yours. I changed to the one that looks like Jan's
> > and still get the same error.
>
> Mine was wrong, the code here clearly does "%s%d", so that is
> "servername serverid", and not "serverid servername" as I wrote earlier.
>
>
> Jan
>
>
___________________
Jt "The Squeegy" Chiodi
http://www.squeegy.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]