Thomas Valentino Crimi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How deep are your pthreads patches? I'm considering getting coda to
> work on my FreeBSD Alpha machine, but my cursory attempt to get lwm to
> work failed (I also had to make numerous long -> time_t changes - is
> there any reason to go with longs?). Would you say it's easier to keep
> working with lwm or to try to merge ptrheads (#ifdef?) :)
On arla, getting lwp to work was a 30m min work when we got the asmembly
resonebly put together.
You will have the long -> sane_type_t conversions anyway.
Accully the pthread wrapper we have is a based on old code source that was
a wrapper around cthreads. And it anyone got that running on NT I would be
*very* happy.
Love
