Hello, coda hackers!
My personal opinion:
> 1. Make it robust (may be we are already there? :)
For me, coda is robust. It is working fine for me on a production
environment.
> 2. Relax server file number limitation to say 500Gb of 10k-files
> (even if by a cute configuration utility creating 10 servers at once?)
Greater it will be good, but I have no problem on its actual limitations.
> 3. Create a working client solution (client, gateway, samba setup,
> anything) for Win2k & similar
I do not use Win2k, can't give opinion.
> 4. Introduce real encryption and make both the server and clients
> basically resistant against spoofing, buffer overflows and other
> evident types of attack
This could be interesting to use it on a exposed environment, but only as
an option -it could work slower-.
Anyway, I think that there is only one problem with coda: the
documentation. It is somewhat hard to follow it, because it has a strange
organization for me.
This does not do less of the "great thing": coda is a great filesystem,
that give to us practical solutions for practical problems. Thanks, coda
developers! Excelent work! I want to thank also to Jan Harkes for his
help. Without it, it would be impossible for me to use it.
Yours:
David
http://www.orcero.org/irbis
