Wouldn't static type-inferencing of Python give the same benefits, without forcing programmers to write "Java-like" declarations? Type inferencing would catch potential uninitialized variables, calling non-existent methods, etc. ... and combined with a tool like lib2to3 could be used to automatically insert type annotations into the code.
On 27 May 2013 06:09, Raphael Clifford <drr...@gmail.com> wrote: > The email below was sent before it was finished. > > var foo = 15 > [...] > var foo = 10 > > should return an error. > > > foo = 15 > > should return an error if foo was not declared before. > > The second answer of > > http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/15468/what-are-the-drawbacks-of-python > (with 60 votes) has some more details of a very similar suggestion. > > Is it possible for use pyflakes with some suitably defined annotation > to do something equivalent? Getting python devs to accept the > suggestion for the core python language more not be at all plausible. > > Raphael > > > > On 27 May 2013 14:05, Raphael Clifford <drr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I have recently been talking to friends/colleagues about their reasons > > for not using python for large projects (say from a thousand lines of > > code and with at least three people contributing). One of the problems > > that comes up time and again is the difficulty in debugging python > > code and in particular the simple sounding job of catching typos. One > > specific suggestion is the following. > > > > Make variable declaration compulsory. For example. > > > > var foo = 15 > > [...] > > var foo = 10 > > > > should return an error. > > > > > > Similarly > _______________________________________________ > code-quality mailing list > code-quality@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/code-quality >
_______________________________________________ code-quality mailing list code-quality@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/code-quality