On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thena...@logilab.fr> wrote: > On 07 juin 09:18, Martin Pool wrote: >> On 7 June 2013 06:49, Skip Montanaro <s...@pobox.com> wrote: >> >> > If I never refer to self.x or self.y within the class's methods it >> > would be nice to be alerted. >> > >> >> +1, and that seems feasible to add to pylint. > > Hey guys, today is your last chance to contribute this to the pylint 10th > anniversary sprint ;) > And to get it in forthcoming 1.0... > > Monday and tuesday reports: > https://www.logilab.org/blogentry/146924 > https://www.logilab.org/blogentry/147339 > > -- > Sylvain Thénault, LOGILAB, Paris (01.45.32.03.12) - Toulouse (05.62.17.16.42) > Formations Python, Debian, Méth. Agiles: http://www.logilab.fr/formations > Développement logiciel sur mesure: http://www.logilab.fr/services > CubicWeb, the semantic web framework: http://www.cubicweb.org
I don't have a bunch of spare time, but can you point me in the general direction of where such a check would be made? I believe pylint already has a "set but not used" message for local variables. This check could, I think, be patterned after that code. Sorry, I wasn't aware you were sprinting. Skip _______________________________________________ code-quality mailing list code-quality@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/code-quality
