On 17 juillet 16:59, Lionel Barret wrote: > I didn't follow pylint progress but 2 years ago clonedigger was the clear > winner.
Pylint's similarity checker being fairly simple, I'm easily trusting you on this. > But you're right I need to see if having this other tool is worth pursuing. > I'll test again, in one or two weeks to see how they compare now. > It's only a single data point but it is a beginning Yep. And it may give a few ideas to get Pylint's checker on track for a minimal cost. -- Sylvain Thénault, LOGILAB, Paris (01.45.32.03.12) - Toulouse (05.62.17.16.42) Formations Python, Debian, Méth. Agiles: http://www.logilab.fr/formations Développement logiciel sur mesure: http://www.logilab.fr/services CubicWeb, the semantic web framework: http://www.cubicweb.org _______________________________________________ code-quality mailing list code-quality@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/code-quality
