Sylvain, >> I'm a developer of PyCharm. We've created a type database for some parts of >> the standard library manually based on the docs. As for now, its format is >> an implementation detail of PyCharm, but we have some plans making it >> available and extendable for other people and tools. We also interested in >> efforts regarding the standardization of type annotations. We'll announce >> our plans later on, stay tuned. > > Sounds like such a library, as we're targeting with astroid, would be of > interest for a lot of people and would allow great gain to python code-quality > tool. Would you be interested in attempting to share efforts? Anyway I can't > wait to read more on this.
I've seen your pylint-brain repo, where you use an imperative approach for creating static equivalents of dynamic objects. In PyCharm we also use a similar approach, but we are interested in a more declarative database of static skeletons of dynamic objects (Python code + type annotations) that could be useful for various tools. As I've mentioned above, we will publish more info and our ideas regarding possible collaboration on this subject later on. -- Andrey Vlasovskikh Senior Software Developer JetBrains, Inc. http://www.jetbrains.com/ "Develop with pleasure!" _______________________________________________ code-quality mailing list code-quality@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/code-quality
