I was thinking by checker...but now that you point it out I realize that by module being checked would be interesting, too.
- mulhern ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Torsten Marek" <shlo...@gmail.com> > To: "Anne Mulhern" <amulh...@redhat.com> > Cc: "code-quality" <code-quality@python.org> > Sent: Sunday, December 7, 2014 4:51:01 AM > Subject: Re: [code-quality] Time cost for pylint analyses? > > Hi Anne, > > should be fairly simple, yes. What kind of breakdown do you mean, by > module/package or by checker? > > // Torsten > > 2014-12-04 22:41 GMT+01:00 Anne Mulhern <amulh...@redhat.com>: > > > Hi! > > > > Would it be possible to be able to extend pylint somehow to > > record a time cost for individual pylint analyses? > > > > - mulhern > > _______________________________________________ > > code-quality mailing list > > code-quality@python.org > > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/code-quality > > > _______________________________________________ code-quality mailing list code-quality@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/code-quality
