(I'm sorry, I accidentally had mail delivery turned off, so I reply to
myself)

> This sounds like a great feature.  Have you considered contributing it
> as a pull request into pylint?

I will be glad to - you can use the code for whatever you like - but I
think that a member of the team should review my code and say what he
thinks and how it should be integrated into the main code.

> I tried this on my large project (Open edX), and it generally worked
> great, but was one crash:

I updated the gist so now I hope it would work - can you check?

Cheers,
Noam



On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Noam Yorav-Raphael <noamr...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Take a look at cached_pylint.py at
> https://gist.github.com/noamraph/c933b32deb8304ac7ccd
>
> It records module dependencies, and when a module passes with no warnings,
> it records it together with the sha1 of the contents of each of its
> dependencies, so when run again it could pass without checking it.
>
> Dependencies are recorded by using infer and by using ImportsChecker, so
> if module A imports something from module B that was actually defined in
> module C, both B and C will be recorded as dependencies of A.
>
> We have a medium sized code repository that took two minutes for each
> check. Now pylint only checks the modified modules, and it takes two
> seconds.
>
> I tested it with pylint 1.4.3.
>
> Hope this helps someone,
>
> Noam
>
_______________________________________________
code-quality mailing list
code-quality@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/code-quality

Reply via email to