Maybe it makes sense to not inconvenience people going to tutorials? Should
we change the day/meal. Since PyCon provides breakfast, we could do a
breakfast meetup during PyCon. That should be free of conflicts
On May 24, 2016 11:23 PM, "Ian Lee" <ianlee1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Looks like the tutorials end at 12:20 and start back up at 13:20. I'm ok
> leaving a little early, but I'd personally like to be back in time for the
> start of them at 13:20.
>
> I don't know the good places, but how about we plan on something close to
> the venue at 11:45? That should give us until 13:00 or so and plenty of
> time for those of us with afternoon tutorials to make it back. Objections?
> Recommendations on a place to eat?
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Dan Wandschneider <
> daniel.wandschnei...@schrodinger.com> wrote:
>
>> Lunch on Sunday makes sense.
>>
>> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 6:58 AM, Ian Lee <ianlee1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I would prefer lunch (between the tutorials) over dinner, as there is
>>> the opening reception on the evening of the 29th (which as you might guess,
>>> I'm planning to attend.)
>>>
>>> https://us.pycon.org/2016/events/reception/
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, May 18, 2016, Eric Casteleijn <thisf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> 29th works for me, either lunch or dinner. Frank's noodle house is
>>>> close to the Pycon venue, and probably has most of the dietary options
>>>> covered, but Portland's pretty easy to get around, so if people have
>>>> specific hankerings and are willing to take a bus, I'd be happy to come up
>>>> with other suggestions.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Ian Cordasco <
>>>> graffatcolmin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> We didn't really decide on a time.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think we'll all be around on the 29th though. Would lunch or dinner
>>>>> on the 29th sound appealing to anyone?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:34 AM, Matt Chung <m...@itsmemattchung.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > Hey All,
>>>>> > Just following up here.  @Ian, Has a date been established ?  I'll
>>>>> be at
>>>>> > Pycon between the 27th and 31st so hopefully it falls between there
>>>>> :)
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Cheers,
>>>>> > Matt Chung
>>>>> > blog | github | twitter | linkedin
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016, at 12:55 PM, Eric Casteleijn wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Hey, so I meant to reply, and then spaced on it, but: I'd be happy to
>>>>> > suggest locations, once we have a date, and a sense of dietary and
>>>>> other
>>>>> > requirements/desires of attendees, if we plan for it to include
>>>>> food/drinks.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Ian Cordasco <
>>>>> graffatcolmin...@gmail.com>
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Eric Casteleijn <thisf...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >> I will be at Pycon, and would love to attend such a meeting, though
>>>>> I
>>>>> >> realize I've only been lurking here so far. I'd like to contribute
>>>>> more
>>>>> >> though. I live in Portland, so any date is likely to work for me.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Don't worry about being a "lurker". :-) You'll likely be our source
>>>>> of
>>>>> > a location to head to if we can't get a BoF space (which I think will
>>>>> > suit us well).
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I look forward to seeing you, Matt, Ian, and whomever else comes. :-)
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Cheers,
>>>>> > Ian
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>> > - eric casteleijn
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> - eric casteleijn
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> ~ Ian Lee | ianlee1...@gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> code-quality mailing list
>>> code-quality@python.org
>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/code-quality
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> ~ Ian Lee | ianlee1...@gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> code-quality mailing list
> code-quality@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/code-quality
>
>
_______________________________________________
code-quality mailing list
code-quality@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/code-quality

Reply via email to