@Daniel: Here's your code. https://twitter.com/lordmauve/status/718380935532670976 https://twitter.com/lordmauve/status/718449547786207233
I never made it into a pylint module :( On 24 July 2017 at 12:06, Daniel Pope <ma...@mauveweb.co.uk> wrote: > I have written that check previously - specifically for a missing comma in > a list-like context. I will see if I can find the code for it. > > On Mon, 24 Jul 2017, 12:01 Razzi Abuissa, <ra...@abuissa.net> wrote: > >> Hi PyCQA, >> >> I've done a little searching but have not found a lint check for the >> following: >> >> [ >> 'a', >> 'b' >> 'c' >> ] >> >> evaluates to ['a', 'bc'] due to implicit string concatenation, but >> usually it's intended to be ['a', 'b', 'c']. If it is meant to be ['a', >> 'bc'] it's bad style. >> >> Guido recommends popular lint tools add a rule for this here: >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/python-ideas/ >> jP1YtlyJqxs/FacZu-WK_9AJ >> >> If this check does not exist, I would be willing to create a flake8 >> plugin and add it to PyCQA. >> >> Regards, >> >> Razzi >> _______________________________________________ >> code-quality mailing list >> code-quality@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/code-quality >> > > _______________________________________________ > code-quality mailing list > code-quality@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/code-quality > >
_______________________________________________ code-quality mailing list code-quality@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/code-quality
