It's nice to have an opportunity to give them some praise.  I keep going back 
for more because I've found the programs enjoyable and useful.  The course 
material and exercises were practical and I, too, have found the workload and 
pacing reasonable.  

If you have any questions about the classes I know about, please let me know.  
So far, I've taken their Certificate in XML and RDF-Based Systems, Certificate 
in Cataloging and Technical Services and their Certificate in User Experience 
for Libraries.

Kevin French
System Administrator
GMILCS, Inc.
31 Mount Saint Mary's Way
Hooksett, NH 03106-4400
[email protected]
He/his


-----Original Message-----
From: Code for Libraries <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Sarah Green
Sent: Friday, December 24, 2021 3:22 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Library Juice Academy

I have been happy with all of the courses I've taken with them, save one.
After some in the class complained about that one, we were able to take it 
again the following year for free with a different teacher.

On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 5:09 PM Beth Juhl <[email protected]> wrote:

> I've found them invaluable.  I've taken the six-month series on XML - 
> quite a while ago - and a standalone class on GitHub.
>
> The pace is not too hard to keep up on top of work but also homework / 
> exercises that are challenging enough to not let you coast through 
> passively.  In both classes, you were encouraged to work towards  a 
> local / personal project goal you might have, incorporating the class 
> material.
>
> Beth Juhl
> Web Services
> University of Arkansas Libraries
> 365 N. McIlroy Ave.
> Fayetteville, AR 72701
> [email protected]
> she/her
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Code for Libraries <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
> charles meyer
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2021 4:01 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [CODE4LIB] Library Juice Academy
>
> Has anyone on the list tkane any of their courses?
>
> Likes? Dislikes?
>
> They offer some interesting titles?
>
> Thank you!
>
> Charles.
>

Reply via email to