It's not a charged issue, it's simply a harmful but entirely
unnecessary practice. For a much more eloquent explanation, see for
example
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Besides, not all email clients have a reply-to-sender feature (mine -
Apple Mail - for example doesn't), but practically all have a reply-
to-all feature.
-hilmar
On Mar 30, 2007, at 1:45 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Mar 30, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Daniel Chudnov wrote:
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Ross Singer wrote:
Well that probably didn't need to go to the whole world, but there
you go.
/me votes for turning off reply-to munging on this list.
-1 - replies should go to lists. :) i know, i know, its a very
charged issue, but i feel strongly that an e-mail list is about
community and i can easily hit reply-to-sender in my mail interface
if i want to send something privately. and i am very aware that
others feel strongly on the opposite side of this issue.
Erik
--
===========================================================
: Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at duke dot edu :
===========================================================
