Hi Charles-Antoine,

I can't be terribly specific about timing, but ranging anywhere
between "eventually" and "in the near future", we here at LC will
have an alpha offering of LCSH data as SKOS RDF that should be
available to the public.  The SKOS data should be able to help with
your thesaurus hierarchy needs.  Several offices in LC are trying to
work out the delivery mechanism details right now.

Ed Summers, who is doing the lion's share of the development work,
can speak about how he crafted the expression of LCSH->SKOS.

Clay

On Feb 7, 2008, at 5:49 PM, Charles Antoine Julien, Mr wrote:

A kind fellow on NGC4Lib suggested I mention this here.



I'm developing a 3D "fly-through" interface for an LCSH organized
collection but I'm having difficulty finding a library willing to
"give"
me a subset of their data (i.e., subject headings (broad to narrow
terms) and the bib records to which they have been assigned).  They
just
don't see why they should help me.  Their value added isn't clear to
them since this is experimental and I have no wish turn this into a
business (I like to build and test solutions...selling them isn't my
piece of pie).



I'm planning to import the data into Access or SQL Server
(depending how
much I get) and partly normalize the bib records so subject terms for
each item are in a separate one-to-many table.  I also need the
authority data to establish where each subject term (and its
associated
bib records) resides in the broad to narrow term hierarchy...this is
more useful in the sciences which seems to have 4-6 levels deep.



Jonathan Rochkind (kind fellow in question) suggested the following



-I could access data directly through Z39.5...

-I could "take" LC subject authority data in MARC format from a
certain
grey-area-legal source

-I could take bib records (and their associated LCSH terms) from

http://simile.mit.edu/wiki/Dataset_Collection Particularly:
http://simile.mit.edu/rdf-test-data/barton/compressed/

In particular, the "Barton" collection. That will be in the MODS
format,
which will actually be easier to work with than library standard MARC.

Or http://www.archive.org/details/marc_records_scriblio_net



Obviously I'm not looking forward to parsing MARC data although I've
heard there are scripts for this.



Additional suggestions and/or comments would be greatly appreciated.



Thanks a bunch,



Charles-Antoine Julien

Ph.D Candidate

School of Information Studies

McGill University


Reply via email to