I don't suppose we could see a post on some of the new FUD, could we? *nudge, nudge*. I hear somethings from my current position, but I haven't really heard anything new or stronger in the past few years. If you've heard some more I'd be curious what it is. (In no small part so I'm somewhat prepared for it if similar rhetoric is used to justify unwise decisions).
Jon Gorman ---- Original message ---- >Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:20:44 -0400 >From: "K.G. Schneider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Announcement: Open Source In Libraries Website >To: [email protected] > >Keep in mind that anti-OSS FUD has reached new levels, now that vendors >see that it is gaining traction. So OSS has to be presented >strategically and in context of the dumb statements I hear, which >include all the stereotypes and b.s. I discussed in my 2007 c4l keynote >but now go beyond it. > >K.G. Schneider
