This gets religious quickly, but, in my experience, programmers who learn on a framework miss out on their understanding of database necessities. They may not matter much when you have a low-traffic, low-content situation, but as your traffic and data grow you're going to want an understanding of how MySQL optimizes queries, what's expensive and what's not, and so forth. Although anyone can learn anything, experience is the best teacher, and, in my experience, frameworks encourage you to avoid that experience.
For example, the Ruby programmers I've worked with have been unaware that MySQL only uses one index per table per select, causing them to index far more than they need, how joins work across different MySQL data types, the advantages of ganging your inserts together, etc. This stuff adds up fast. Of course, the same arguments could be leveled against PHP in favor of C, against C in favor of assembly, etc.. Abstraction always has merits and demerits. Tim On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Cloutman, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is why most Web applications have to implement CRUD interfaces. PHP is > definitely for the uninitiated. > > Along the lines of CodeIgnitor, I would suggest using another framework > Symfony. It's a very powerful, yet easy to learn framework, and it will > autogenerate the CRUD for you. Really, some framework is probably the way to > go for this, regardless of which you choose. > > - David > > -----Original Message----- > From: Code for Libraries on behalf of Ken Irwin > Sent: Wed 7/30/2008 6:35 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: [CODE4LIB] what's friendlier & less powerful than phpMyAdmin? > > Hi folks, > > I have some straightforward MySQL data tables that I would like to be > editable by some of my less-techy colleagues. I tend to think of > phpMyAdmin as a perfectly serviceable and reasonably interface for > updating database tables, but I'm told that it's kind of intimidating to > the uninitiated. > > Are there alternatives that are meant for non-admin-types? I'd want > something with read/write permissions, but that could be targeted at > just a few tables, wouldn't have any of the more potent tools (drop, > empty, etc.). In the ideal world, I might like something that would > prevent users from doing things like accidentally changing primary key > data and things like that. > > I've thought about writing something, but I suspect that would be > reinventing the wheel. Any ideas? > > Thanks, > Ken > > -- > Ken Irwin > Reference Librarian > Thomas Library, Wittenberg University > > > Email Disclaimer: http://www.co.marin.ca.us/nav/misc/EmailDisclaimer.cfm > -- Check out my library at http://www.librarything.com/profile/timspalding
