My point is that I don't see how they're different in practice. And one of them actually allowed you to do something from your email client.
-Ross. On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Karen Coyle <li...@kcoyle.net> wrote: > Ross, I don't get your point. My point was about the confusion between two > things that begin: http:// but that are very different in practice. What's > yours? > > kc > > Ross Singer wrote: >> >> Your email client knew what do with: >> >> info:doi/10.1111/j.1475-4983.2007.00728.x ? >> >> doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2007.00728.x ? >> >> Or did you recognize the info:doi scheme and Google it? >> >> Or would this, in case of 99% of the world, just look like gibberish >> or part of some nerd's PGP key? >> >> -Ross. >> >> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Karen Coyle <li...@kcoyle.net> wrote: >> >>> >>> Ross Singer wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Karen Coyle <li...@kcoyle.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> But shouldn't we be able to know the difference between an identifier >>>>> and >>>>> a >>>>> locator? Isn't that the problem here? That you don't know which it is >>>>> if >>>>> it >>>>> starts with http://. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> But you do if it starts with http://dx.doi.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> No, *I* don't. And neither does my email program, since it displayed it >>> as a >>> URL (blue and underlined). That's inside knowledge, not part of the >>> technology. Someone COULD create a web site at that address, and there's >>> nothing in the URI itself to tell me if it's a URI or a URL. >>> >>> The general convention is that "http://" is a web address, a location. I >>> realize that it's also a form of URI, but that's a minority use of http. >>> This leads to a great deal of confusion. I understand the desire to use >>> domain names as a way to create unique, managed identifiers, but the http >>> part is what is causing us problems. >>> >>> John Kunze's ARK system attempted to work around this by using http to >>> retrieve information about the URI, so you're not just left guessing. >>> It's >>> not a question of resolution, but of giving you a short list of things >>> that >>> you can learn about a URI that begins with http. However, again, unless >>> you >>> know the secret you have no idea that those particular URI/Ls have that >>> capability. So again we're going beyond the technology into some human >>> knowledge that has to be there to take advantage of the capabilities. It >>> doesn't seem so far fetched to make it possible for programs (dumb, dumb >>> programs) to know the difference between an identifier and a location >>> based >>> on something universal, like a prefix, without having to be coded for >>> dozens >>> or hundreds of exceptions. >>> >>> kc >>> >>> >>>> >>>> I still don't see the difference. The same logic that would be >>>> required to parse and understand the info: uri scheme could be used to >>>> apply towards an http uri scheme. >>>> >>>> -Ross. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> ----------------------------------- >>> Karen Coyle / Digital Library Consultant >>> kco...@kcoyle.net http://www.kcoyle.net >>> ph.: 510-540-7596 skype: kcoylenet >>> fx.: 510-848-3913 >>> mo.: 510-435-8234 >>> ------------------------------------ >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > -- > ----------------------------------- > Karen Coyle / Digital Library Consultant > kco...@kcoyle.net http://www.kcoyle.net > ph.: 510-540-7596 skype: kcoylenet > fx.: 510-848-3913 > mo.: 510-435-8234 > ------------------------------------ >