Loins, Daniel wrote:
Well, I've been meaning to toss New Haven, CT, into the ring, but was waiting
to get more feedback/expressions of interest from my colleagues here (and also
thinking that 2012 might be better for East Coast).
Anyway, I can try to have a skeletal proposal ready by the 5th (unless someone
at Yale tries to talk me out of it).
Daniel
Personally, I think the more applications the better. So I say go for
it. Also, I hope some of the sites that weren't voted in last time
re-submit their application.
Edward
On Mar 2, 2010, at 10:15 PM, Michael J. Giarlo wrote:
SIDEBAR:
Granted "these economic times," but am I the only one who's surprised
not to hear more interest in hosting next year's conference? Yes,
yes, we're a bunch of damned procrastinators, I know.
-Mike
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 21:41, William Denton <w...@pobox.com> wrote:
On 2 March 2010, Ziso, Ya'aqov wrote:
Many institutions would consider Canada an international conference, and
most likely would allow (if any!?) one. My 5 cents (and that's all left in
the budget),
s/Many/Many American/ but I know what you mean. I don't see a local chapter
meeting as conflicting with the full conference, and don't think that's
anything to worry about.
I'd like to go to Vancouver for a Code4Lib---it's certainly easy for me to
get to, from Toronto, and I won't have the difficulties and anxieties that
come from travelling into the US---but I hope some small to mid-size
American cities put in too. Providence and Asheville were great to visit.
Bill
--
William Denton, Toronto : miskatonic.org www.frbr.org openfrbr.org
