So wait, why didn't the QDC people just use oai_dc too?
Riley, Jenn wrote:
I'm still confused about all this stuff too, but I've often see the
oai_dc format (for OAI/PMH I think?) used as a 'standard' way to expose
simple DC attributes.
Yep, it's the same approach as was taken with the QDC format CONTENTdm uses
that I mentioned - a third party defining its own wrapper since the DCMI didn't
do it themselves. oai_dc showed up earlier than any of the QDC formats (I
think) and its use in OAI-PMH pretty much cemented it. I've never seen simple
DC in XML use a different wrapper than the one oai_dc provides. Not the case
for QDC, though, unfortunately.
One thing I was confused about was whether the oai_dc format _required_
the use of the "old style" DC uri's, or also allowed the use of the
DCterms URIs? Anyone know? I kind of think it actually requires the
old-style DC uri's, as it was written before "dcterms".
That's my understanding as well. oai_dc predates the defining of the 15 legacy
DC properties in the dcterms namespace, and it's my guess nobody saw a reason
to update the oai_dc definition after this happened.
Jenn
