Wait, I'm so confused. Is SRU 2.0 actually a published standard, or are
you just showing us a work in progress that nobody should be writing
code to yet?
I'm confused because I thought it was just a draft work in progress, but
then you talk about official vs unofficial copies... an unofficial copy
of a draft work in progress that isn't a spec yet anyway? Very confused.
If I'm planning on writing software to SRU... do you recommend I use the
(until now not publically available so I didn't have a choice)
"unofficial" SRU 2.0 thing, or is that still just a draft work in
progress nobody should be writing software to yet?
Jonathan
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote:
For those of you who have recently asked about current OASIS drafts of SRU
(2.0) and CQL ...
The *official* versions reside at OASIS, but because of confusing (and
sometimes inaccessible) links, as well as uncertainty about status
(because of imbedded dates), we now maintain *unofficial copies* of the
most current versions at:
http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/oasis/current/sru-2-0.doc
http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/oasis/current/cql.doc
We will continue to maintain copies of the most current version at these
URLs.
--Ray
