Hey Owen,

Seems like the you could use the <dlf:holdings> element to hold this kind of 
individual library information.

The DLF-ILS documentation doesn't seem to think that you would use 
dlf:simpleavailability here, though, but rather MARC or ISO holdings schemas.

But if you're controlling both ends of the communication, I don't know if it 
really matters.

--Dave

==================
David Walker
Library Web Services Manager
California State University
http://xerxes.calstate.edu
________________________________________
From: Code for Libraries [code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of Owen Stephens 
[o...@ostephens.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 12:22 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: [CODE4LIB] Help with DLF-ILS GetAvailability

I'm working with the University of Oxford to look at integrating some library 
services into their VLE/Learning Management System (Sakai). One of the services 
is something that will give availability for items on a reading list in the VLE 
(the Sakai 'Citation Helper'), and I'm looking at the DLF-ILS GetAvailability 
specification to achieve this.

For physical items, the availability information I was hoping to use is 
expressed at the level of a physical collection. For example, if several 
college libraries within the University I have aggregated information that 
tells me the availability of the item in each of the college libraries. 
However, I don't have item level information.

I can see how I can use simpleavailability to say over the entire institution 
whether (e.g.) a book is available or not. However, I'm not clear I can express 
this in a more granular way (say availability on a library by library basis) 
except by going to item level. Also although it seems you can express multiple 
locations in simpleavailability, and multiple availabilitymsg, there is no way 
I can see to link these, so although I could list each location OK, I can't 
attach an availabilitymsg to a specific location (unless I only express one 
location).

Am I missing something, or is my interpretation correct?

Any other suggestions?

Thanks,

Owen

PS also looked at DAIA which I like, but this (as far as I can tell) only 
allows availabitlity to be specified at the level of items


Owen Stephens
Owen Stephens Consulting
Web: http://www.ostephens.com
Email: o...@ostephens.com
Telephone: 0121 288 6936

Reply via email to