> > If you haven't read one of the books, doesn't that argue for it's lack of > 'greatness?' > > That would imply the most widely read books are great. I shudder to think what the list would look like...
- Re: [CODE4LIB] how 'great' are the great books McAulay, Elizabeth
- Re: [CODE4LIB] how 'great' are the great b... Roberto Hoyle
- Re: [CODE4LIB] how 'great' are the gre... Elizabeth Winter
- Re: [CODE4LIB] how 'great' are th... Keith Jenkins
- Re: [CODE4LIB] how 'great' are th... McAulay, Elizabeth
- Re: [CODE4LIB] how 'great' are the gre... Eric Lease Morgan
- Re: [CODE4LIB] how 'great' are th... Peter Murray
- Re: [CODE4LIB] how 'great' ar... Eric Lease Morgan
- Re: [CODE4LIB] how 'great' are th... Cindy Harper
- Re: [CODE4LIB] how 'great' ar... Jonathan Rochkind
- Re: [CODE4LIB] how 'great' are the gre... Kyle Banerjee
- Re: [CODE4LIB] how 'great' are the gre... McAulay, Elizabeth
- Re: [CODE4LIB] how 'great' are the great books Kyle Banerjee
