I agree with Luciano that the lead time was a bit short for me. Well, maybe not specifically because it was short, but it does conflicts with something else I have to do and I don't have time to reschedule. I really like this idea and I hope it can be successful, so I hope this message brought a rash of sign-ups and it goes on, or it is rescheduled.
Edward On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Luciano Ramalho <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Peter Murray <[email protected]> wrote: >> So far no one has signed up to present on Monday and only one person has >> signed up to attend. It sounds like the idea of virtual lightning talks >> isn't going to fly. If you have feedback (e.g., not interesting, not enough >> lead time to prepare, wrong time of day/week/year), I'd appreciate hearing >> it. > > As a Pythonista I am a huge fan of lightning talks, a staple of PyCons > all over the World. > > Virtual lightning talks is a novel idea to me, but sounds great. > > I'd be interested in attending and even presenting, but I think the > lead time was too short, particularly for an activity intended for > business hours (1:30pm EDT is 2:30pm BRT / UTC-3). > > How about trying again, but aiming at a date in late April? > > -- > Luciano Ramalho > programador repentista || stand-up programmer > Twitter: @luciano >
