Hi,

So, what we are doing is establishing the relationships between people and 
organizations from a set of court cases where slaves sued for their freedom. 
Those interested can get a bit more information here: 
http://digital.wustl.edu/legalencodingproject/about.html. We're interested in 
people's roles in the court cases, but also their roles society and the 
organizations to which they belong.

Our ontology will either be based of CIDOC-CRM or it will be based off some 
CIDOC concepts combined with some FOAF concepts. Optimally, I'd like to only 
use CIDOC if possible. To do that though, is it best to include all of the 
classes which a concept belongs to? For instance, I will use the class 
"person". Is it necessary to include the super classes of "Actor" "Persistent 
Item" and "CRM Entity"?

Best,

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Alexander Johannesen
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 4:08 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Ontology Question

Hiya,

> Is it okay to just use the classes I need or should I include the super 
> classes which they belong to?

I think we also need to define a few concepts here. What do you mean, 
"include"? As far as I can tell, you want to say something like "Here's a few 
concepts we're using, and their definition is based off this other ontology 
over *there* (pointing)", but that's not always the case, so just asking.

Now, Karen is of course right in her take on it, but there's a little thing 
that require a bit of focus, and that's how this new ontology is going to be 
used. Is it one of these manual labour things where it doesn't actually require 
formal definitions as much as a human one, or is it (however you use the 
ontology) to be passed through a tool, or more formally passed through an 
inferencer?


Regards,

Alex
--
 Project Wrangler, SOA, Information Alchemist, UX, RESTafarian, Topic Maps
--- http://shelter.nu/blog/ ----------------------------------------------
------------------ http://www.google.com/profiles/alexander.johannesen ---

Reply via email to