Regardless of whether or not you enter this, Michael, every vote from the Diebold-o-tron in the t-shirt election will go towards this design.
Mark my words. -Ross. On Aug 15, 2012, at 9:16 AM, Doran, Michael D wrote: >> Second the motion to stop beating this dead horse. > > > > Dang, and I was already working on this 2013 conference t-shirt design... > > > > [cid:[email protected]] > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > >> Friscia, Michael > >> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 7:46 AM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] It's all job postings! > >> > >> Second the motion to stop beating this dead horse. > >> > >> ___________________________________________ > >> Michael Friscia > >> Manager, Digital Library & Programming Services > >> > >> Yale University Library > >> (203) 432-1856 > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Code for Libraries >> [mailto:[email protected]]<mailto:[mailto:[email protected]]> >> On Behalf Of > >> Carol Bean > >> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 8:43 AM > >> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] It's all job postings! > >> > >> No. > >> > >> Just no. Vote taken. Preferences noted. Done. > >> > >> Carol > >> > >> Sent from my iPhone > >> > >> On Aug 15, 2012, at 4:50 AM, Graham Triggs >> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> On 6 August 2012 13:19, Ed Summers <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >>> wrote: > >>>> 150 people responded about whether jobs.code4lib.org posting should > >>>> come to the discussion list: > >>>> > >>>> yes: 132 > >>>> no: 10 > >>>> who cares: 8 > >>>> > >>>> 93% in support or agnostic seems to be a good indicator that the > >>>> postings should continue to come to the list for now. > >>> > >>> I'm not entirely convinced about that assessment. I quite readily > >>> agree that the jobs should be posted to *a* mailing list, I'm not so > >>> sure that it should be this mailing list. > >>> > >>> It's been discussed about filtering the jobs sent to the list, but I > >>> already filter the code4lib mailing list into a tag. It's been a bit > >>> of a faff, but I've subdivided the filtering so that I can get the > >>> messages sent from jobs@... to go to a different tag. But then Ed > >>> replied to one, so now it appears in both tags, and because I'm using > >>> Gmail, it takes the whole thread with it. > >>> > >>> So filtering really isn't a solution. > >>> > >>> Rather than just asking whether jobs should come to this mailing list, > >>> maybe we can ask whether a separate mailing list should be set up, > >>> specifically for jobs. The two mailing lists could be cross promoted > >>> (e.g. a standard footer), and people can choose whether they want or > >>> don't want to receive them. And we can still have > >>> discussions/follow-ups about those jobs on that mailing list. > >>> > >>> Even though the vast majority of the postings aren't applicable to me, > >>> I would probably still sign up to a separate jobs mailing list as it > >>> is of interest - but I would at least then be able to keep that > >>> separate from the main discussions, which is something I can't > >>> effectively do right now. > >>> > >>> G
