Wow. We could not have gotten a better follow-up to our long thread
about coders and non-coders.
I don't git. I've used it to read code, but never contributed. I even
downloaded a gui with a cute icon that is supposed to make it easy, and
it still is going to take some learning.
So I'm afraid that it either needs to be on a different platform for
editing, OR someone (you know, the famed "someone") is going to have to
do updates for us non-gitters.
kc
On 11/30/12 7:36 AM, Michael J. Giarlo wrote:
All,
Please feel free to make the changes you'd like to see and then submit a
pull request. I have added instructions for how to do this in the README:
https://github.com/code4lib/antiharassment-policy
I say this not to shame anyone in the jerky "patches welcome!" sense, but
as an acknowledgement that the way shiz gets done in code4lib is for each
of us to take individual initiative. You're all empowered to do so. I
look forward to seeing your changes in the repo.
-Mike
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Tim Spalding <t...@librarything.com> wrote:
I'd support removing or somehow couching language about any organizer,
including any volunteer, immediately ending a talk.
All the other sanctions seem to involve the likelihood of deliberation
involving some time and multiple people, and some possibility of a
misunderstanding being cleared up. I don't think a single volunteer—who, in
theory, is granted the power to ban someone for life!—is going to ban
someone or refuse to post a talk online without thinking about it for a
while and involving other organizers.
By their nature, however, something said in the middle of a talk doesn't
admit of much in the way of deliberation between organizers, or time to
deliberate, and you can't really finish a talk ended by someone if other
organizers persuade the volunteer that they made a mistake. The action has
to be taken quickly, by someone who hasn't talked it through with others
and is largely irreversible. It's a recipe for controversy and
disagreement, and potential unfairness.
I propose that the right reaction to an offensive talk is for people to
walk out of it while it's going on, and to deal with any sanctions required
AFTER the talk is over, when there's time and space to get the decision
right.
Sincerely,
Tim Spalding
LibraryThing
--
Karen Coyle
kco...@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet
