I'm gonna add to this briefly, and probably a bit less tactfully than Jonathan :-)
- My number-one complaint about past presentations: Don't have slides we can't read. "You probably can't read this, but..." isn't a helpful thing to hear during a presentation. Make it legible, or figure out a different way to present the information. A kick-ass poster or UML diagram or flowchart or whatever isn't kick-ass when we can't read it. It's just an uninformative blur. [Note: this doesn't mean you shouldn't include the kick-ass poster when you upload your slides. Please do!] - Make sure your content fits well in the time allotted. You're not there to "get through as much as possible." You're there to best use our collective time to make the argument that what you're doing is important/impressive/worth knowing, and to convey *as much of the interesting bits as you can without rushing*. The goal isn't for you to get lots of words out of your mouth; the goal is for us to understand them. If you absolutely can't cut it down to a point where you're not rushing, then you haven't done the hard work of distilling out the interesting bits, and you should get on that right away. - On the flip side, don't present for 8mn and "leave plenty of time for questions." Odds are your'e not saying anything interesting enough to elicit questions in those 8 minutes. If you really only have 8mn of content, well, you shouldn't have proposed a talk. But odds are you *do* have interesting things to say, and may want to chat with your colleagues to figure out exactly what that is. - Don't make the 3.38 million messages on creating a non-threatening environment be for naught. Please. As Jonathan said: this is a great, great audience. We're all forgiving, we're all interested, we're all eager to lean new things and figure out how to apply them to our own situations. We love to hear about your successes. We *love* to hear about failures that include a way for us to avoid them, and you're going to be well-received no matter what because a bunch of people voted to hear you! On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Jonathan Rochkind <rochk...@jhu.edu> wrote: > We are all very excited about the conference next week, to speak to our > peers and to hear what our peers have to say! > > I would like to suggest that those presenting be considerate to your > audience, and actually prepare your talk in advance! > > You may think you can get away with making some slides that morning during > someone elses talk and winging it; nobody will notice right? Or they wont' > care if they do? > > From past years, I can say that for me at least, yeah, I can often tell > who hasn't actually prepared their talk. And I'll consider it disrespectful > to the time of the audience, who voted for your talk and then got on > airplanes to come see it, and you didn't spend the time to plan it advance > and make it as high quality for them as you could. > > I don't mean to make people nervous about public speaking. The code4lib > audience is a very kind and generous audience, they are a good audience. > It'll go great! Just maybe repay their generosity by actually preparing > your talk in advance, you know? Do your best, it'll go great! > > If you aren't sure how to do this, the one thing you can probably do to > prepare (maybe this is obvious) is practice your presentation in advance, > with a timer, just once. In front of a friend or just by yourself. Did you > finish on time, and get at least half of what was important in? Then you're > done preparing, that was it! Yes, if you're going to have slides, this > means making your slides or notes/outline in advance so you can practice > your delivery just once! > > Just practice it once in advance (even the night before, as a last > resort!), and it'll go great! > > Jonathan > -- Bill Dueber Library Systems Programmer University of Michigan Library
