Hi Ben, On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Ben Companjen <ben.compan...@dans.knaw.nl>wrote:
> Returning an HTML document (or XML document as I get) in > response to a request for an RDA property or class is wrong in the Linked > Data sense [note 1]. This is explained in the W3C WG Note that you > referred to in recipe 2 [2]. > I'm the co-author of that note, so I'm all too familiar with it. :-) At the moment, it shouldn't be possible to request html from rdaregistry.info without getting redirected to www.rdaregistry.info (hosted on github using github pages). Although I'm doing a minimal job of checking the HTTP Accept header. > > Are you planning on introducing 303-redirects? > I'm deeply embarrassed (really) by the fact that the redirect is not a 303 and that it may not be consistent. As well as by the fact that it doesn't return the requested fragment (which I still believe is best practice). So, yeah, as soon as I get back from the ALA Midwinter conference (sooner if I can get some meeting-free time). I'll at least get a 303 redirect header in there (still learning nginx). Cheers! Jon