I agree with all of these points (though perhaps not barn-level enthusiasm)! 
Don't shoot the messenger. ;) 

This seems like a great opportunity to provide insight to the non-programmery 
authors on how we can increase tech use and awareness in the library field at 
large. I encourage all to get in touch!

Ashley

Sent from my non-wifi

> On Mar 25, 2014, at 9:03 AM, Miles Fidelman <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Come to think of it, there's nothing there to frame the intent and scope of 
> the book - is it aimed at librarians who write code, or at librarians who are 
> trying to guide people to topical material?
> 
> Either way, it sure seems like at least three framing topics are missing:
> - a general overview of programming language types and characteristics (i.e., 
> context for reading the other chapters)
> - a history of programming languages (the family tree, if you will)
> - programming environments, platforms, tools, libraries and repositories - a 
> language's ecosystem probably influences choice of language use as much as 
> the language itself
> - "non-language languages" - e.g., sql/nosql, spreadsheet macros and other 
> platforms that one builds on
> 
> Miles Fidelman
> p.s. I wrote a book for ALA Editions, they were great to work with.  The 
> acquisitions editor I worked with is now a Sr. Editor, so I expect they're 
> still good folks to work with.
> 
> Jason Bengtson wrote:
>> I'm also surprised not to see anything about the sql/nosql end of the 
>> equation. Integral to a lot of apps and tools . . . at least from a web 
>> perspective (and probably from others too).
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Jason Bengtson, MLIS, MA
>> Head of Library Computing and Information Systems
>> Assistant Professor, Graduate College
>> Department of Health Sciences Library and Information Management
>> University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
>> 405-271-2285, opt. 5
>> 405-271-3297 (fax)
>> [email protected]
>> http://library.ouhsc.edu
>> www.jasonbengtson.com
>> 
>> NOTICE:
>> This e-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is 
>> addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or 
>> otherwise exempt from disclosure. If the reader of this e-mail is not the 
>> intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the 
>> message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
>> dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly 
>> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please 
>> immediately notify us by replying to the original message at the listed 
>> email address. Thank You.
>> 
>>> On Mar 25, 2014, at 7:39 AM, Ian Ibbotson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Going in the other direction from cobol and fortran -Fair warning - Putting
>>> on java evangelist hat- :) I wonder if it might be worth suggesting to the
>>> authors that they change java into "JVM Languages" and cover off Java,
>>> Scala, Groovy,...(others). We've had lots of success in the GoKB(
>>> http://gokb.org/) and KB+(https://www.jisc-collections.ac.uk/News/kbplus/)
>>> Knowledge Base projects using groovy on grails - Essentially all the
>>> pre-built libraries and enterprise gubbins of Java, but with a more
>>> ruby-esq idiom making it much more readable / less verbose / more
>>> expressive, and integrating nicely with all that existing enterprise
>>> infrastructure to boot.
>>> 
>>> The use of embedded languages in JVMs (Including javascript) means that the
>>> use of Domain Specific Languages are becoming more and more widespread
>>> under JVMs, and this seems (To me) an area where there is some real
>>> advantage to having practitioners with real coding skills - Maybe not the
>>> hardcore systems development stuff but certainly ability to tune and
>>> configure software. Expressing things like business rules in DSLs (EG How
>>> to choose a supplier for an item, or how to deduplicate a title) gives
>>> librarians an opportunity to tune the behaviour of systems dynamically
>>> without system level changes.
>>> 
>>> Owen (Who's always lurking around here somewhere) wears a (technical)
>>> librarians hat and often dives into KB+ and GoKB code base to give me an
>>> idea of whats going wrong along with bug reports, sometimes with a fix
>>> attached. I think this kind of collaboration, where systems librarians /
>>> end user representatives are able to review and comment on code is
>>> incredibly powerful and it's certainly served us well in our library
>>> projects.
>>> 
>>> Just a thought :)
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Ian.
>>> 
>>> Ian Ibbotson
>>> Director
>>> Knowledge Integration Ltd
>>> 35 Paradise Street, Sheffield. S3 8PZ
>>> T: 0114 273 8271
>>> M: 07968 794 630
>>> W: http://www.k-int.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 25 March 2014 12:22, Miles Fidelman <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Visual Basic is still going strong.
>>>> Conspicuous by their absence: COBOL and Fortran - also still going strong.
>>>> 
>>>> Miles Fidelman
>>>> 
>>>> Roy Tennant wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Basic? Seriously? I mean, the very first language I learned, in the early
>>>>> 1980s, was BASIC. But come on. If you can find a person to write the
>>>>> chapter I want to take them out behind the barn and, well, do them some
>>>>> serious damage. Interpret that however you wish.
>>>>> Roy
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Ashley Blewer <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>> Passing this along because it seems relevant to the interests of many on
>>>>>> this list!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> See ya tomorrow or on the internet,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> - Ashley
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Fwd:
>>>>>> This is a call for book chapters for  A Librarian’s Introduction to
>>>>>> Programming Languages to be published  by ALA/ Neal-Schuman Publishing.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This book will look at a variety of programming languages with the intent
>>>>>> to familiarize readers with the reasons for using each language. The book
>>>>>> will cover practical, real world examples to illustrate how a specific
>>>>>> language can be used to enhance library services and resources.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The target audience includes current practitioners, administrators,
>>>>>> educators, and students.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Some potential topics to be included in the book are below.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ● Basic
>>>>>> ● C#
>>>>>> ● Java
>>>>>> ● Javascript
>>>>>> ● Perl
>>>>>> ● Python
>>>>>> ● Ruby
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We are also interested in other topics. For more information email the
>>>>>> editors:
>>>>>> Ron Brown [email protected] and Beth Thomsett-Scott
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Apologies for cross posting.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Please feel free to share this announcement with other listservs and
>>>>>> interested parties.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Ashley Blewer
>>>>>> Fox Movietone Collection Project Cataloging Manager
>>>>>> Moving Image Research Collections
>>>>>> University of South Carolina
>>>>>> 803.403.5013
>>>> --
>>>> In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
>>>> In practice, there is.   .... Yogi Berra
> 
> 
> -- 
> In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
> In practice, there is.   .... Yogi Berra

Reply via email to