On Feb 10, 2016, at 1:06 AM, Greg Lindahl <lind...@pbm.com> wrote:

> Hi! I'm a new employee of the Internet Archive, formerly a search
> engine guy, mostly working on search for the Wayback Machine. In my
> spare time I've been working on a visualization of dates and entities
> in scanned book contents. There's a blog post about it here:
> 
> https://blog.archive.org/2016/02/09/how-will-we-explore-books-in-the-21st-century/
> 
> And the demo itself is here:
> 
> https://books.archivelab.org/dateviz/
> 
> I'm going to be attending the Philly conference, and I'm looking
> forward to hearing from folks about other discovery tools driven
> by content or algorithmic metadata.
> 
> —
> greg


Yes, very cool. Thank you for bringing this to our attention.

>From my point of view, Greg, you have created an alternative and supplemental 
>index to one or more books. While printed books have a whole lot of utility, 
>digital books manifest a different sets of functionality. Imagine having a 
>digital book and then providing services against the text that go beyond find. 
>(“Blasphemy!”) One of the services would be graphing as you (literally) 
>illustrate above. Other services might be parts-of-speech analysis, definition 
>extraction, tabulations of additional named-entities, etc. While reading 
>fiction is many times intended for “just fun”, I believe these sorts of 
>services may make fiction more interesting as well as more accessible for 
>study. Again, thank you.

— 
Eric Lease Morgan

Reply via email to